Validity of case being claimed
I received a judgment claimed to be from Appeal Court of Rabat under file 290/1645/2024. I was never notified nor my lawyer and it appears to be issued after Court of Cassation issued cancellation of appealed judgment and returned all cases to be reviewed from begining on 14 February, 2024. I am under impression that this new file apparently issued 23 December 2024, and case , may be fraudulent as person who provided it has been known to falsify documents. Court of Cassation was refering to appeals and files: 176/ 1620/2016, 74/1622/2018, 1452/1622/2019 d
Power of attorney was not terminated. I ordered lawyer were not notified. Party is using the decree to claim her judgment to receive 200,000 + euro is reconfirmed yet Court of Cassation cancelled all. The case in fact is not confirmation of judgment but decree on salary/pay slip validity, correct?
لا يمكنني تأكيد ما جاء في تعليقك الأخير ولكن اتصل بمحاميك ليعطيك كل الأحكام التي صدرت في نزاعك مع هذه السيدة للاطلاع عليها ولتكوين صورة كاملة عن القضية لأجيبك على تساؤلك الأخير وغيره من التساؤلات التي قد تود طرحها، ثم أرسل الأحكام لمدير الموقع بالبريد الإلكتروني، وبعد الاطلاع عليها سوف أوضح لك كل الجوانب الغامضة، ولكن لا تنس إخبار محاميك بالاطلاع على ملف الاستئناف الأخير لمعرفة سبب صدور حكم دون أن يتم إعلامكما.
I cannot confirm what was stated in your last comment, but contact your lawyer to get all the rulings issued in your dispute with this woman so that you can review them and get a complete picture of the case in order to answer your last question and any other questions you may wish to ask. Then send the rulings to the site manager by email, and after reviewing them, I will clarify all the unclear aspects for you. But don't forget to tell your lawyer to review the latest appeal file to find out why a ruling was issued without informing you both.
من الناحية القانونية محكمة الاستئناف لما تتوصل بقرار النقض والإحالة من محكمة النقض فإنها تعمل على استدعاء الطرفين المتخاصمين للجلسة التي تحددها، وفي الغالب يتم استدعاء المحامي الذي ناب عنهما إلا إذا رفض المحامي التوصل بالاستدعاء بعلة أن وكالته قد انتهت، وفي هذه الحالة يتم إعادة استدعاء الطرفين شخصيا.
ما تفضلت به بأن حكم الاستئناف صدر بدون استدعائك أو استدعاء محاميك لا يمكن التأكد منه إلا بتكليف محاميك بالانتقال إلى مقر محكمة الاستئناف والاطلاع هناك عى الملف والبحث عن شهادة تسليم الاستدعاء أو ما يفيد تعذر التوصل واتخاذ قرار بتعيين قيم للبحث عن الشخص الذي تعذر العثور عليه، وأستبعد هذا الأمر إذا وجه الاستدعاء لمكتب محاميك فهو لن يرفض التوصل إذا كان يعتبر وكالته عنك لم تنته أو لم يكن هناك اتفاق مسبق بينكما أن وكالته خاصة بمحكمة النقض فقط وتنتهي بصدور حكم من هذه المحكمة، لأن من حقه في هذه الحالة أن يرفض استلام الاستدعاء لانتهاء الوكالة.
Legally, when the Court of Appeal receives the cassation and referral decision from the Court of Cassation, it summons both disputing parties to the scheduled hearing. Generally, the lawyer representing them is summoned unless the lawyer refuses to accept the summons, claiming their power of attorney has expired. In that case, the parties are summoned again in person.
Your statement that the appeal ruling was issued without summoning you or your lawyer can only be verified by instructing your lawyer to go to the Court of Appeal, review the case file, and search for proof of service of the summons or any evidence of failure to serve it. A decision should then be made to appoint a guardian to search for the person who could not be located. I find this unlikely if the summons was addressed to your lawyer's office. He would not refuse to accept it if he considers his power of attorney on your behalf still valid, or if there was no prior agreement between you that his power of attorney was limited to the Court of Cassation and terminated upon a ruling from that court. In such a case, he has the right to refuse to accept the summons due to the termination of his power of attorney.